Sideabr Widget Area
Sidebr widget area is empty
To edit this sidebar:
Go to admin Appearance -> Widgets and place widgets into "sidebar" Widget Area
Postado em 8 de julho, 2019
Illinois is 1 step away from sports gambling after a last-ditch effort from Rep. Bob Rita dropped into place that weekend.
House lawmakers voted to approve a broad expansion of gambling within a funding financing bill on Saturday, and the Senate followed suit on Sunday. Gambling provisions within the act include a long-awaited casino in Chicago and authorization for both retail and online sports betting.
The bill goes to the desk of Gov. J.B. Pritzker, whose current comments make it clear he’ll sign it into law. The governor helped shepherd IL sports betting across the finish line, seeking to drive more than $200 million in additional earnings to his nation.
Passage was, honestly, a remarkable accomplishment considering the lack of advancement through the first five months of the year. Previous hints from Rep. Mike Zalewski were all turned aside, and a perceived conflict of interest forced him to step back in the last days of session.
LSR continues to be keeping a close watch on the chatter this weekend and updating this page as the situation unfolded. Here is the play-by-play:
Is Sunday the afternoon for Illinois sports betting?
The Senate finally takes the ground after 4 p.m. local time. It doesn’t take long.
Sen. Terry Link presents the conditions of this amended bill, which includes a complete projected financial impact of $12 billion. Commendations and positive comments from Sen. Dave Syverson, the Senate Minority Leader, appear to signal that passage is a certainty.
Comments are short and largely surface-level, using a couple lawmakers lugging around in narrow provisions that affect their constituents. Sen. John Curran is the only one who talks to sports gambling at any given length, looking for clarification on the branding provisions for online platforms.
Link is psychological as he closes the proceedings, reflecting on his 20-year effort to improve economic development from manufacturing.
The chamber applauds as the board lights up green, and the Senate concurs with the House changes with a 46-10 vote. Just like this, the bill that will legalize sports betting in Illinois is headed to the governor.
IL sports betting bill as amended
Here is the full text of the language:
What is in the change?
The new vertical funding bill includes a multi-faceted gambling package headlined by a mega-casino at Chicago. The step also has six categories of licensure for IL sports gambling:
Master sports wagering
Management services provider Tier 2 official league info provider Central system supplier In plain terms, these categories allow casinos, race tracks, and sports sites to offer sports gambling — equally in-person and online. The provisions that concern online gambling, however, require in-person registration for the initial 18 months.
The amendment also authorizes a lottery execution encompassing 2,500 places in the very first year.
IL sports gambling details
The commission for a master sports betting license is calculated based on gross gaming revenue from the previous calendar year. Casinos will pay 5% of that number to provide sports betting for four decades up to a max of $10 million. That cap wasn’t present in recent versions and should alleviate the load on big operators such as Rush Street Gaming. Rita also softened the proposed tax rate down to 15% of revenue.
As you can infer from the classes, language mandating using official league info for props and in-play gambling stuck. While there’s no ethics fee, the invoice does empower schools and sports leagues to restrict the kinds of accessible wagers. As written, in-state collegiate sports are completely off the board in Illinois.
The change removes the total blackout period for internet betting that snuck to a previous version, but it does keep a modified penalty box for DraftKings and FanDuel. Daily fantasy sports businesses will be permitted to compete in the sports betting arena, but just master licensees can offer online wagering for the first 18 months.
The amendment also creates three online-only licenses costing $20 million apiece, awarded on a delay by means of a competitive procedure.
Saturday: Agreement reached for IL sports betting Around three hours to the weekend semester, we are still in a holding pattern. House lawmakers have ticked several more items off their to-do record now, such as a bill that increases the minimum wages for Illinois teachers. For now, though, there’s nothing new to report online sports gambling.
Aside from the things we are already touched on, a few other challenges have cropped up.
Perhaps most importantly, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot publicly opposes the bill as written. Her main concern is the provision permitting sportsbooks interior of stadiums and arenas.
Mayoral opposition leads to’understanding’
Here’s the statement from Mayor Lightfoot, as mentioned by Capitol Fax:
“I strongly support a gambling bill that directs a new casino and dollars to the city of Chicago. However, I oppose the inclusion of a provision that could open sports wagering in areas like Soldier Field. This type of proposal has the potential to undermine the viability of any Chicago-based casino via the diversion of consumers and revenue from a casino. Since the impact of sports wagering in stadiums hasn’t been completely vetted or analyzed, I can’t support the bill in its current form and advocate the deletion of this stadium-betting provision.”
On Saturday, but the government releases a follow-up statement indicating that the dialogue is moving forward:
“I have spoken to Mayor Lightfoot about her concerns with respect to sports gambling, and we have collaboratively worked with the bill sponsors to make clear that the legislative intent will reflect that there are limitations on both the amount of and places for sports betting venues. I am happy that we have attained this understanding…”
Mayor Lightfoot then drops her opposition via another statement:
“After productive talks with the Governor, we have agreed to allow a limited quantity of betting at sports areas subject to local control and oversight. These improvements to the gambling proposition will allow us to maximize revenue capabilities of a new casino to the Town of Chicago and guarantee a good quality of life for our neighborhoods that might otherwise be impacted. As such, I urge the passage of SB 690 as amended…”
Illinois House votes on sports betting After a break for committee meetings and caucuses, Rep Bob Rita files a final amendment to the funding package. The sports gambling language appears mostly unchanged at a glimpse, although there are a great deal of words to make it through. The bill is called for second reading about 6 p.m. local time and proceeded straight to third.
By that point, it’s evident that House lawmakers have reached an agreement to pass a number of large bills — such as this one — before the end of the night. The floor demonstration becomes something of a victory lap for Rita, with several members commending him for his broad efforts to shore up vertical infrastructure. In his final, Rita thanks Rep. Mike Zalewski for his job.
The House votes 87-27 in favor of passing, sending the bill back into the chamber of origin for concurrence. The Senate meets Sunday at 3 p.m.
Friday: Last gasp for IL sports gambling prospects
Friday was frantic in the state capitol, with a myriad of key issues to hammer on the last day of the scheduled session. Lawmakers did create a dent in the pile of bills, but leaders had been forced to issue a bad-news bulletin extending the work week during Sunday.
Although sports gambling remains unresolved, a significant effort has surfaced.
Rep. Robert Rita grabbed the reins on Friday, borrowing in the framework of Rep. Mike Zalewski to cobble together a compromise bill. His campaign ran out of daylight on the House floor, however, the bonus weekend of lawmaking means there is still hope for sports gambling this year.
While there is some momentum, failure to cast a vote on Friday makes the job a little bit taller. Any bills considered from here out there require a 3/5ths supermajority to pass, a threshold which may just be out of reach.
Here’s a chronological timeline of this day’s events:
A brand new automobile for IL sports gambling Lawmakers start the day behind closed doors, working to finalize the frame for IL sports gambling. Most assume S 516 will serve as the car, a Chicago casino invoice that seems to be an appropriate target for the enabling language. A midday curveball, however, shifts the attention.
Joe Ostrowski is a Chicago radio anchor who has had his ear to the ground nowadays, and he’s the first to reveal that everybody is looking in the incorrect location.
Some optimism in Springfield for sport gambling.
SB 690 should drop very soon.
7:22 PM – May 31, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy Watch Joe Ostrowski’s other Tweets
The bill he references (S 690) isn’t a gambling bill, but a measure amending tax provisions at the Invest in Kids Act. The present version has already cleared the Senate and awaits a floor vote at the lower chamber. Suddenly, some anticipate House lawmakers to submit a new amendment linked to sports betting.
Sure enough, a placeholder pops up on the docket, with a hearing at the House Executive committee scheduled for 1:30 p.m. local time. A change of host to Sen. Terry Link provides another sign that something is about to take place.
LSR sources suggest that there’s good reason to track the conversation all the way up until the past gavel.
Senate Appropriations committee hearing
Sen. Link gifts the amended bill to the committee, and… boy, is there a lot in it.
Along with the gaming provisions, it also rolls taxes for smokes, parking, video lottery terminals, and numerous other mechanisms to increase state revenue. The total fiscal impact is close to $1 billion, together with sports betting representing just a very small component of the bundle.
It is the fastest of hearings, within under five minutes. One member asks whether or not the bill increases the amount of slot machines for every casino licensee — it will — and that is about it.
House Executive committee hearing
A heated floor debate on a marijuana bill (which ultimately passed) delays the home hearing by many hours.
When the committee eventually convenes, Rep. Mike Zalewski is a surprise addition to the dais in the front of the room. Even though the long-suffering proponent of IL sports gambling recently stepped back from the spotlight, Rita’s bill lists him as the primary House sponsor. The committee substitutes Zalewski in as a temporary member to cast a vote in favour of passing.
Without much lead time, the change brings 34 proponents and nine competitions (which later grows to 18). Casino groups including Boyd Gaming, Penn National Gaming, and also the Illinois Casino Association remain opposed to the Last language.
Members of this committee have plenty of questions, but the majority of the conversation centers around gaming provisions not related to sports betting. Rita struggles to explain some of the finer points in detail, especially as they relate to DraftKings and FanDuel. It’s complicated.
The language enables online platforms, but online-only firms can not seek licensure for the first 18 weeks of IL sports gambling. The host indicates he built his bill that way to”give Illinois businesses a ramp” into the new sector. Rita also notes that his amendment will not affect the existing status quo for DFS.
The committee advocates adoption of the change with an 8-5 vote, progressing the bill to the floor. There’s still a lot of work left to do prior to adjournment, equally on sports betting and on many of pivotal issues — including the state budget.
Formerly, in Illinois sports betting…
This year’s effort to legalize sports betting follows in the footsteps of this unsuccessful 2018 effort.
As it did this past year, work began early in 2019. Lawmakers cobbled together many different potential frameworks, each catering to a particular group of stakeholders. Once more, though, nothing widely palatable had emerged since the last couple of hours of session ticked off the clock.
The proposed budget from Gov. J.B. Pritzker includes $217 million in revenue from sports betting, so there is more at stake than just the liberty to wager. Failure would induce Illinois to watch from the sidelines while its neighbors at Indiana and Iowa trigger their new laws.
Who will participate?
The notion of the”penalty box” is your biggest barrier to some passage at the moment.
To make a long story short, some casino groups are working to keep DraftKings Sportsbook and FanDuel Sportsbook out of the Illinois market. They argue that daily fantasy sports is not explicitly lawful in the state, and these so-called awful actors should be deducted from licensure for 3 years. The actual motivation is, clearly, a desire to eliminate competition in the two companies working away with the New Jersey sports gambling market.
DraftKings responded by briefly running a television campaign pushing back on the obstruction from Rush Street Gaming.
How much will it cost?
The sports leagues have also gained more leverage with Illinois lawmakers than they have elsewhere in the nation.
Most previous tips for IL sports betting required payment of an integrity fee and the use of official league information to repay”Tier 2″ wagers. No US sports betting law comprises an integrity fee, and Tennessee is the only one that has a data mandate.
Coupled with licensing fees payable out at $25 million and taxes amounting to 20 percent of earnings, these operational burdens can stand between the bill and the finish line.
Who’s in charge?
Rep. Mike Zalewski carried the baton all spring, but a lack of progress and also a perceived conflict of interest forced him to step aside in the 11th hour.
Start-of-day intel indicates that Rep. Bob Rita is actively working to stuff the allowing language into the broader gambling package before lawmakers head home for the year. In what might be seen as an encouraging sign, Senate Republican Leader Sen. Dave Syverson has signed on as a co-sponsor.
There’s no guarantee that bill moves, though, and it may not include sports gambling provisions even when it does.
Matt Kredell contributed to this story.
Read more: dallassportsrant.com